The Free Encyclopedia

vLLM vs Ollama vs llama.cpp

Three popular ways to run LLMs locally, each tuned for a different priority.

Engine Strength Use when
Ollama Simplest UX, model registry, great DX Personal use, dev, the fleet default
llama.cpp Runs anywhere (CPU, Metal, modest GPUs), GGUF Edge devices, Macs, Jetson, quantized models
vLLM Highest throughput, continuous batching, OpenAI API Serving many concurrent users on a real GPU

The throughput difference

vLLM's PagedAttention manages the KV cache like virtual memory, enabling continuous batching — new requests slot into the batch as others finish. For concurrent load it can be many times faster than one-request-at-a-time engines.

# vLLM — OpenAI-compatible server
python -m vllm.entrypoints.openai.api_server --model meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct

Rule of thumb

  • One user, convenience → Ollama (which wraps llama.cpp).
  • CPU / tiny GPU / Mac → llama.cpp directly.
  • Many users, one big GPU, max tokens/sec → vLLM.

For multi-model GPU layout see Serving Multiple Models on a Dual-GPU Box.

Related: Serving Multiple Models on a Dual-GPU Box · GGUF Quantization Tiers Compared · Ollama Parameters Guide